jsmsJournal of Siberian Medical SciencesJournal of Siberian Medical Sciences2542-1174Federal state budgetary educational institution of higher education "Novosibirsk state medical university" of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (FSBEI HE NSMU MOH Russia)10.31549/2542-1174-2025-9-1-136-150jsms-1155Research ArticleОБЗОРЫREVIEWНеинвазиваная диагностика внутриматочной перегородки. Систематический обзорNon-invasive diagnostics of septate uterus. A systematic reviewhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8116-8611ДробязкоП. А.DrobiazkoP. A.

Дробязко Петр Александрович – врач – акушергинеколог  

123242, г. Москва, ул. Красная Пресня, 16 

Petr A. Drobiazko – Obstetrician-gynecologist, MEDSI Group of Companies 

16, Krasnaya Presnya, Moscow, 123242 

drobyazko.peter@gmail.comФирстоваС. В.FirstovaS. V.

Фирстова Светлана Витальевна – заведующий отделением акушерства и гинекологии, врач акушер-гинеколог 

Москва

Svetlana V. Firstova – Head, Obstetrics and Gyneco logy Department, Obstetrician-gynecologist, MEDSI Group of Companies 

Moscow 

АО «Группа компаний «МЕДСИ», Клинико-диагностический центр на Красной ПреснеРоссияMEDSI Group of Companies, JSC, Clinical and Diagnostic Center on Krasnaya PresnyaRussian Federation20252503202501136150Copyright © Дробязко П.А., Фирстова С.В., 20252025Дробязко П.А., Фирстова С.В.Drobiazko P.A., Firstova S.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://jsms.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1155

Аномалии развития матки являются наиболее сложными и комплексными проблемами в современной гинекологии. Например, частота встречаемости внутриматочной перегородки колеблется от 1–2 на 1000 и до 15 на 1000 женщин, в зависимости от региона. В настоящее время эта проблема вызывает широкий интерес у научного сообщества. Для настоящего обзора было отобрано 14 исследований, проведенных в период с 1992 по 2020 г., из 336 идентифицированных публикаций. В отношении аномалий развития матки и внутриматочной перегородки диагностическая точность магнитно-резонансной томографии составила 90,2 %, трехмерной сонографии – 95,6 %, эхогистеросальпингоскопии – 96,2 %, двухмерной сонографии – 61,3 %, гистеросальпингографии – 56,1 %.

Uterine congenital anomalies are the most difficult and comprehensive problems of modern gynecology. For example, the incidence of septate uterus ranges from 1–2 per 1000 to 15 per 1000 women, depending on the region. Currently, this topic is widely covered by the interest of the scientific community. For this review, 14 studies conducted between 1992 and 2020 were selected from 336 identified publications. With regard to anomalies of the uterus and intrauterine septum, the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging was 90,2%, three-dimensional sonography – 95,6%, saline infusion sonography – 96,2%, two-dimensional sonography – 61,3%, hysterosalpingography – 56,1%.

внутриматочная перегородкааномалии развития маткианомалии мюллерова протокаультразвуковая диагностикадвухмерная сонографиятрехмерная сонографиямагнитно-резонансная томографиягистеросальпингографияэхогистеросальпингоскопиягистероскопияseptate uterusuterine congenital anomaliesMüllerian duct anomaliesultrasound diagnosticstwo-dimensional sonographythree-dimensional sonographymagnetic resonance imaginghysterosalpingographysaline infusion sonographyhysteroscopyReferencesJean Cruveilhier, Carl v. Rokitansky, Rudolf Virchow. Fundaments of pathology, thoughts on the 100th anniversary of Rokitansky’s death // Virchows Arch. A Pathol. Anat. Histol. 1978;378(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1007/BF00427181.Jean Cruveilhier, Carl v. Rokitansky, Rudolf Virchow. Fundaments of pathology, thoughts on the 100th anniversary of Rokitansky’s death. Virchows Arch. A Pathol. Anat. Histol. 1978;378(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1007/BF00427181.Valle R.F., Ekpo G.E. Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus: review and meta-analysis // J. Minim. Invas. Gynecol. 2013;20(1):22-42.Valle R.F., Ekpo G.E. Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus: review and meta-analysis. J. Minim. Invas. Gynecol. 2013;20(1):22-42.Buttram V.C. Jr, Gibbons W.E. Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases) // Fertil. Steril. 1979;32(1):40-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0015- 0282(16)44114-2.Buttram V.C. Jr, Gibbons W.E. Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases). Fertil. Steril. 1979;32(1):40-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44114-2.The American Fertility Society. Classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions // Fertil. Steril. 1988;49(6): 944-955. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7.The American Fertility Society. Classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil. Steril. 1988;49(6): 944-955. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7.Jones W.S. Congenital anomalies of the female genital tract // Trans. N. Engl. Obstet. Gynecol. Soc. 1953;7:79- 94.Jones W.S. Congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Trans. N. Engl. Obstet. Gynecol. Soc. 1953;7:79- 94.Oppelt P., Renner S.P., Brucker S. et al. The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations // Fertil. Steril. 2005;84(5):1493-1497. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.036.Oppelt P., Renner S.P., Brucker S. et al. The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil. Steril. 2005;84(5):1493-1497. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.036.Acién P., Acién M.I. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system // Hum. Reprod. Update. 2011;17(5):693-705. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr021.Acién P., Acién M.I. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2011;17(5):693-705. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr021.Grimbizis G.F., Gordts S., Di Spiezio Sardo A. et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies // Hum. Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032-2044. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det098.Grimbizis G.F., Gordts S., Di Spiezio Sardo A. et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum. Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032-2044. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det098.Ludwin A., Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice // Hum. Reprod. 2015;30(3):569- 580. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu344.Ludwin A., Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum. Reprod. 2015;30(3):569- 580. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu344.Woelfer B., Salim R., Banerjee S. et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening // Obstet. Gynecol. 2001;98(6):1099-1103. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01599-x.Woelfer B., Salim R., Banerjee S. et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001;98(6):1099-1103. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01599-x.Ludwin A., Ludwin I., Banas T. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uterus // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2011;37(3):178-186. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01304.x.Ludwin A., Ludwin I., Banas T. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uterus. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2011;37(3):178-186. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01304.x.Uterine septum: a guideline // Fertil. Steril. 2016;106(3):530-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.014.Uterine septum: a guideline. Fertil. Steril. 2016;106(3):530-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.014.Pfeifer S.M., Attaran M., Goldstein J. et al. ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021 // Fertil. Steril. 2021;116(5):1238-1252. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025.Pfeifer S.M., Attaran M., Goldstein J. et al. ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil. Steril. 2021;116(5):1238-1252. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025.Howick J., Chalmers I., Glasziou P. et al. Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence (Background Document). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. URL: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levelsof-evidence/explanation-of-the-2011-ocebm-levels-ofevidence (дата обращения: 05.02.2025).Howick J., Chalmers I., Glasziou P. et al. Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence (Background Document). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. URL: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levelsof-evidence/explanation-of-the-2011-ocebm-levels-ofevidence (accessed: 05.02.2025).Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews // BMJ.2021;372:n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.Pellerito J.S., McCarthy S.M., Doyle M.B. et al. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography // Radiology. 1992;183(3):795-800. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.183.3.1584936.Pellerito J.S., McCarthy S.M., Doyle M.B. et al. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology. 1992;183(3):795-800. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.183.3.1584936.Jurkovic D., Geipel A., Gruboeck K. et al. Threedimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1995. ;5(4):233-237. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05040233.x.Jurkovic D., Geipel A., Gruboeck K. et al. Threedimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1995. ;5(4):233-237. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05040233.x.Raga F., Bonilla-Musoles F., Blanes J., Osborne N.G. Congenital Müllerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound // Fertil. Steril. 1996;65(3):523-528. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58147-3.Raga F., Bonilla-Musoles F., Blanes J., Osborne N.G. Congenital Müllerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertil. Steril. 1996;65(3):523-528. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58147-3.Wu M.H., Hsu C.C., Huang K.E. Detection of congenital müllerian duct anomalies using threedimensional ultrasound // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1997;25(9):487-492. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199711/12)25:9<487::aid-jcu4>3.0.co;2-j.Wu M.H., Hsu C.C., Huang K.E. Detection of congenital müllerian duct anomalies using threedimensional ultrasound. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1997;25(9):487-492. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199711/12)25:9<487::aid-jcu4>3.0.co;2-j.Alborzi S., Dehbashi S., Parsanezhad M.E. Differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus by sonohysterography eliminates the need for laparoscopy // Fertil. Steril. 2002;78(1):176-178. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03163-1.Alborzi S., Dehbashi S., Parsanezhad M.E. Differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus by sonohysterography eliminates the need for laparoscopy. Fertil. Steril. 2002;78(1):176-178. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03163-1.Momtaz M.M., Ebrashy A.N., Marzouk A.A. Threedimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity // Middle East Fertil. Soc. J. 2007;12(1):41-46.Momtaz M.M., Ebrashy A.N., Marzouk A.A. Threedimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity. Middle East Fertil. Soc. J. 2007;12(1):41- 46.Mueller G.C., Hussain H.K., Smith Y.R. et al. Müllerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189(6):1294-1302. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2494.Mueller G.C., Hussain H.K., Smith Y.R. et al. Müllerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189(6):1294-1302. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2494.Saravelos S.H., Cocksedge K.A., Li T.C. The pattern of pregnancy loss in women with congenital uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage // Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2010;20(3):416-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.021.Saravelos S.H., Cocksedge K.A., Li T.C. The pattern of pregnancy loss in women with congenital uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2010;20(3):416-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.021.Адамян Л.В., Панов В.О., Макиян З.Н. и др. Магнитно-резонансная томография в дифференциальной диагностике аномалий матки и влагалища: алгоритм исследования и МРТ семиотика // Медицинская визуализация. 2009;6:100-113.Adamyan L.V., Panov V.O., Makiyan Z.N. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis anomalies of the uterus and vagina: algorithm research and MRI semiotics. Medical Visualization. 2009;6:100-113. (In Russ.)Ghi T., Casadio P., Kuleva M. et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies // Fertil. Steril. 2009;92(2):808-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.086.Ghi T., Casadio P., Kuleva M. et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil. Steril. 2009;92(2):808-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.086.Sheth S.S., Sonkawde R. Uterine septum misdiagnosed on hysterosalpingogram // Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2000;69(3):261-263. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00243-5.Sheth S.S., Sonkawde R. Uterine septum misdiagnosed on hysterosalpingogram. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2000;69(3):261-263. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00243-5.Ludwin A., Pityński K., Ludwin I. et al. Two- and threedimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri // J. Minim. Invas. Gynecol. 2013;20(1):90-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.011.Ludwin A., Pityński K., Ludwin I. et al. Two- and threedimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri. J. Minim. Invas. Gynecol. 2013;20(1):90-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.011.Есипова И.А., Краснова И.А., Бреусенко В.Г. Возможности трехмерной эхографии в диагностике аномалий мюллеровых протоков // Акушерство и гинекология. 2020;10:125-134. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2020.10.125-134.Esipova I.A., Krasnova I.A., Breusenko V.G. Possibilities of three-dimensional echoghraphy in t he diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020;10:125-134. DOI: 10.18565/aig.2020.10.125-134. (In Russ.)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.