Molecular and cellular mechanisms of undifferentiated forms of connective tissue dysplasia (literature review)
https://doi.org/10.31549/2542-1174-2026-10-2-146-162
Abstract
Introduction. Undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasias include hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) (frequency ~1:500). Current treatment and diagnostics of these disorders are based on clinical aspects and do not reflect the pathogenetic features of these conditions. New insights into connective tissue disorganization open up new possibilities in search for drug target and diagnostic biomarkers.
Aim . To develop an updated model of the pathogenesis of HSD and hEDS to provide a rationale for the choiсe of potential drug targets and methods of laboratory diagnostics.
Material and methods . PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and eLibrary were searched for peer-reviewed publications of 2012–2025.
Results. Transcriptomic studies revealed no significant differences between HSD and hEDS: expression of 826 genes (DNA repair, cytoskeleton) was downregulated, while expression of 126 genes (proteases, proinflammatory cytokines) was upregulated. The exception is MTHFR polymorphisms; however, different allele frequencies between HSD and hEDS have not been confirmed in cohort studies. In cell cultures, common basic mechanisms were identified, including predominance of myofibroblast differentiation via TGF-β and integrin-dependent pathways. Impaired synthetic activity of myofibroblasts leads to aberrant deposition of types I, III, and V collagen, an decrease in the number of cross-links, and intracellular accumulation of elastin. This causes extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation with formation of fragments of fibronectin (52 kDa) and type I collagen (45 kDa). ECM disruption results in fascial densification and dislocations. Based on these mechanisms, potential drug targets were identified: inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (doxycycline), folate cycle correction (5-methyltetrahydrofolate), and TGF-β signaling blockade (celiprolol).
Conclusion . No significant differences in genomic profiles or cellular metabolic activity between HSD and hEDS were found. These conditions represent a common process of connective tissue disorganization. The main pathogenetic mechanism is a vicious circle of myofibroblast activation, ECM disorganization, immune cell activation, and chronic inflammation, which further stimulates myofibroblasts. Pathogenetically justified therapeutic approaches include MMP inhibition, folate cycle correction, and TGF-β blockade. The corresponding molecules (doxycycline, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, and celiprolol) require clinical validation.
About the Authors
M. V. DvornichenkoRussian Federation
Marina V. Dvornichenko – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Department of Human Anatomy with a Course of
Topographic Anatomy and Operative Surgery
2, Moskovskiy trakt, Tomsk, 634050
M. V. Belousov
Russian Federation
Mikhail V. Belousov – Dr. Sci. (Pharmaceut.), Head,
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis
Tomsk
Yu. Y. Melnik
Russian Federation
Yulia Y. Melnik – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Human Anatomy with a Course of Topographic Anatomy and Operative Surgery
Tomsk
E. A. Zinovyev
Russian Federation
Egor A. Zinovyev – Research Assistant, Laboratory of Cellular and Microfl uidic Technologies; 5th-year Student, Faculty of Medicine
Tomsk
A. D. Sudakov
Russian Federation
Artyom D. Sudakov – 6th-year Student, Faculty of Medicine
Tomsk
E. R. Loban
Russian Federation
Ekaterina R. Loban – 6th-year Student, Faculty of Medicine
Tomsk
V. A. Byakov
Russian Federation
Vadim A. Byakov – 6th-year Student, Faculty of Medicine
Toms
E. A. Marzol
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Marzol – Post-graduate Student, Department of Morphology and General Pathology; Senior Lecturer, Department of Human Anatomy with a Course of Topographic Anatomy and Operative Surgery; Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Cellular and Microfluidic Technologies
Tomsk
References
1. Gensemer C., Burks R., Kautz S. et al. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: Complex phenotypes, challenging diagnoses, and poorly understood causes. Dev. Dyn. 2021;250(3):318-344. DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.220.
2. Castori M., Tinkle B., Levy H. et al. A framework for the classification of joint hypermobility and related conditions. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2017;175(1):148-157. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31539.
3. Scicluna K., Formosa M.M., Farrugia R., Borg I. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A review and a critical appraisal of published genetic research to date. Clin. Genet. 2022;101(1):20-31. DOI: 10.1111/cge.14026.
4. Morlino S., Castori M. Placing joint hypermobility in context: traits, disorders and syndromes. Br. Med. Bull. 2023;147(1):90-107. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldad013.
5. Hakim A.J., Tinkle B.T., Francomano C.A. EhlersDanlos syndromes, hypermobility spectrum disorders, and associated co-morbidities: Reports from EDS ECHO. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2021;187(4):413-415. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31954.
6. Ritelli M., Chiarelli N., Cinquina V. et al. RNA-Seq of dermal fibroblasts from patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders supports their categorization as a single entity with involvement of extracellular matrix degrading and proinflammatory pathomechanisms. Cells. 2022;11(24):4040. DOI: 10.3390/cells11244040.
7. Halverson C.M.E., Clayton E.W., Garcia Sierra A., Francomano C. Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome on the diagnostic odyssey: Rethinking complexity and difficulty as a hero’s journey. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2021;187(4):416-424. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31935.
8. Aubry-Rozier B., Schwitzguebel A., Valerio F. et al. Are patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or hypermobility spectrum disorder so different? Rheumatol. Int. 2021;41(10):1785-1794. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04968-3.
9. Carroll M.B. Hypermobility spectrum disorders: A review. Rheumatol. Immunol. Res. 2023;4(2):60-68. DOI: 10.2478/rir-2023-0010. 1
10. Malfait F., Francomano C., Byers P. et al. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2017;175(1):8-26. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31552.
11. Tinkle B., Castori M., Berglund B. et al. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (a.k.a. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Type III and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type): Clinical description and natural history. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2017;175(1):48-69. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31538.
12. Ritelli M., Chiarelli N., Cinquina V. et al. Looking back and beyond the 2017 diagnostic criteria for hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A retrospective crosssectional study from an Italian reference center. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2024;194(2):174-194. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63426.
13. Yew K.S., Kamps-Schmitt K.A., Borge R. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders. Am. Fam. Physician. 2021;103(8):481-492.
14. Tofts L.J., Simmonds J., Schwartz S.B. et al. Pediatric joint hypermobility: a diagnostic framework and narrative review. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2023;18(1):104. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02717-2.
15. Blajwajs L., Williams J., Timmons W., Sproule J. Hypermobility prevalence, measurements, and outcomes in childhood, adolescence, and emerging adulthood: a systematic review. Rheumatol. Int. 2023;43(8):1423- 1444. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05338-x.
16. Forghani I., See J., McGonigle W.C. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: Diagnostic challenges and the role of genetic testing. Genes (Basel). 2025;16(5):530. DOI: 10.3390/genes16050530.
17. Ritelli M., Chiarelli N., Cinquina V. et al. Bridging the diagnostic gap for hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders: Evidence of a common extracellular matrix fragmentation pattern in patient plasma as a potential biomarker. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2025;197(1):e63857. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63857.
18. Tellman T.V., Dede M., Aggarwal V.A. et al. Systematic analysis of actively transcribed core matrisome genes across tissues and cell phenotypes. Matrix Biol. 2022;111:95-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2022.06.003.
19. Smolgovsky S., Theall B., Wagner N., Alcaide P. Fibroblasts and immune cells: at the crossroad of organ inflammation and fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2024;326(2):H303-H316. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00545.2023.
20. Chiarelli N., Zoppi N., Cinquina V. et al. Transcriptome-wide expression profiling in skin fibroblasts of patients with joint hypermobility syndrome/ Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161347. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161347.
21. Courseault J., Umar M., Bordnick P. et al. Prevalence of MTHFR polymorphisms in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobile spectrum disorders in a US Hypermobility Clinic. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2024;6(7):399-402. DOI: 10.1002/ acr2.11667.
22. Zoppi N., Chiarelli N., Binetti S. et al. Dermal fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition sustained by αvβ3 integrin-ILK-Snail1/Slug signaling is a common feature for hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2018;1864(4 Pt A):1010-1023. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.01.005.
23. Brock I., Prendergast W., Maitland A. Mast cell activation disease and immunoglobulin deficiency in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorder. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2021;187(4):473-481. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31940.
24. Meng X.M., Nikolic-Paterson D.J., Lan H.Y. TGFβ: the master regulator of fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2016;12(6):325-338. DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.48.
25. Zoppi N., Chiarelli N., Ritelli M., Colombi M. Multifaced roles of the αvβ3 integrin in Ehlers-Danlos and arterial tortuosity syndromes’ dermal fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19(4):982. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19040982.
26. Li Y., Zhao J., Yin Y. et al. The role of IL-6 in fibrotic diseases: Molecular and cellular mechanisms. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022;18(14):5405-5414. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.75876.
27. Chiarelli N., Zoppi N., Ritelli M., et al. Biological insights in the pathogenesis of hypermobile EhlersDanlos syndrome from proteome profiling of patients’ dermal myofibroblasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2021;1867(4):166051. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.166051.
28. Halper J. Basic components of connective tissues and extracellular matrix: fibronectin, fibrinogen, laminin, elastin, fibrillins, fibulins, matrilins, tenascins and thrombospondins. In J. Halper (ed.) Progress in Heritable Soft Connective Tissue Diseases. 2nd ed. Springer, 2021. P. 105–126.
29. Frevert C.W., Felgenhauer J., Wygrecka M. et al. Danger-associated molecular patterns derived from the extracellular matrix provide temporal control of innate immunity. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2018;66(4):213- 227. DOI: 10.1369/0022155417740880.
30. Zhang H., Caudle Y., Wheeler C. et al. TGF-β1/Smad2/3/ Foxp3 signaling is required for chronic stress-induced immune suppression. J. Neuroimmunol. 2018;314:30- 41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.11.005.
31. Wang T.J., Stecco A., Hakim A.J., Schleip R. Fascial pathophysiology in hypermobility spectrum disorders and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A review of emerging evidence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26(12):5587. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26125587.
32. Emerah A., Mostafa S., Kotb L. et al. The burden of entheseal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: A comparative ultrasonographic study. Clin. Rheumatol. 2024;43(1):219-226. DOI: 10.1007/s10067- 023-06792-7.
33. Wang T.J., Stecco A., Schleip R. et al. Change in gliding properties of the iliotibial tract in hypermobile EhlersDanlos Syndrome. J. Ultrasound. 2023;26(4):809- 813. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-023-00775-7.
34. Jensen J.K., Nygaard R.H., Svensson R.B. et al. Biomechanical properties of the patellar tendon in children with heritable connective tissue disorders. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018;118(7):1301-1307. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3854-2.
35. Atwell K., Michael W., Dubey J. et al. Diagnosis and management of hypermobility spectrum disorders in primary care. J. Am. Board. Fam. Med. 2021;34(4):838- 848. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.04.200374.
36. Kciuk O., Li Q., Huszti E., McDermott C.D. Pelvic floor symptoms in cisgender women with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome: An international survey study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2023;34(2):473-483. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-052969.
37. Fede C., Petrelli L., Pirri C. et al. Innervation of human superficial fascia. Front. Neuroanat. 2022;16:981426. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2022.981426.
38. Utreras E., Keller J., Terse A. et al. Transforming growth factor-β1 regulates Cdk5 activity in primary sensory neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287(20):16917- 16929. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.329979.
39. Udugampolage N., Taurino J., Bassotti A. et al. Exploring fatigue in Marfan and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: an analytical cross-sectional study in two Italian healthcare centres. BMJ Open. 2025;15(1):e087298. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087298.
40. Fiengo E., Sbarbati A. Lipedema and hypermobility spectrum disorders sharing pathophysiology: A cross-sectional observational study. J. Clin. Med. 2025;14(20):7195. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14207195.
41. Scheper M., Rombaut L., de Vries J. et al. The association between muscle strength and activity limitations in patients with the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: the impact of proprioception. Disabil. Rehabil. 2017;39(14):1391-1397. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1196396.
42. Mense S. Innervation of the thoracolumbar fascia. Eur. J. Transl. Myol. 2019;29(3):8297. DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2019.8297.
43. Daylor V., Griggs M., Weintraub A. et al. Defining the chronic complexities of hEDS and HSD: a global survey of diagnostic challenges, life-long comorbidities, and unmet needs. J. Clin. Med. 2025;14(16):5636. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14165636.
44. Chiarelli N., Zoppi N., Venturini M. et al. Matrix metalloproteinases inhibition by doxycycline rescues extracellular matrix organization and partly reverts myofibroblast differentiation in hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome dermal fibroblasts: A potential therapeutic target? Cells. 2021;10(11):3236. DOI: 10.3390/ cells10113236.
45. Briest W., Cooper T.K., Tae H.J. et al. Doxycycline ameliorates the susceptibility to aortic lesions in a mouse model for the vascular type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011;337(3):621- 627. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.110.177782.
46. Sastry P.S.R.K. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a proposal. Med. Hypotheses. 2002;59(3):314-315. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-9877(02)00175-5.
47. Shapiro J.R. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibition in connective tissue disorders. Expert Opin. Investig Drugs. 2018;27(9):713-720. DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1512589.
48. Krishnamoorthy S. Selective inhibition of MMP-2 protein for preventing decorin cleavage linked with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. IJHSR. 2026. DOI: 10.36838/v8i3.76. URL: https://terra-docs. s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/IJHSR/Articles/volume8-issue3/IJHSR_2026_83_76.pdf (accessed 10.06/2026)
49. Courseault J., Kingry C., Morrison V. et al. Folatedependent hypermobility syndrome: A proposed mechanism and diagnosis. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e15387. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15387.
50. Dubacher N., Munger J., Gorosabel M. et al. Celiprolol but not losartan improves the biomechanical integrity of the aorta in a mouse model of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020;116(2):457-465. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz095.
51. Saputra P.B.T., Widiarti W., Siahaan P.P. et al. The impact of celiprolol in vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A systematic review of current evidence. Med. Sci. (Basel). 2025;13(2):74. DOI: 10.3390/medsci13020074.
Review
For citations:
Dvornichenko M.V., Belousov M.V., Melnik Yu.Y., Zinovyev E.A., Sudakov A.D., Loban E.R., Byakov V.A., Marzol E.A. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of undifferentiated forms of connective tissue dysplasia (literature review). Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. 2026;10(2):146-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31549/2542-1174-2026-10-2-146-162
JATS XML

























