Anatomical justification of a modified way of enteric anastomosis formation under diffuse peritonitis
Abstract
The paper presents a study of vascular micromorphology along the enteric anastomosis suture and determination of the degree of the anastomosis deformation at different intersection angles with intestinal wall under diffuse purulent peritonitis. Anatomical analysis was carried out using autopsied specimens. Submucosal and muscular layers of intestinal wall intersected at an angle of 60° demonstrate significantly larger number of arterial and venous vessels, as opposed to intersection at an angle of 90° to the colon axis. This is because at intersection angle of 60° blood is supplied to the section line from at least two adjacent straight arteries. In contrast, when the section is made at an angle of 90°, blood is only supplied to the section line through branches of a single straight artery. It is found that, when intestinal wall is intersected at an angle of 60°, there is no critical anastomosis deformation, while blood supply along the suture line improves significantly. When end-to-end enteric anastomosis is formed, afferent and efferent intestinal loops intersecting at an angle of 60° facilitate better blood supply to suture lines without forcing excessive deformation, which enhances reparative processes in the anastomosis area and reduces probability of a leak.
About the Authors
Y. S. Vainer
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
K. V. Atamanov
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Y. A. Veryatin
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Егоров В.И. Кишечные анастомозы. Физико-меха-нические аспекты. М., 2004. 304 с.
2. Хирургия тяжелых гнойных процессов / Е.Г. Григорьев, А.С. Коган, К.А. Апарцин и др. Новосибирск: Наука, 2000. 313 c.
3. Hyoju S.K., Klabbers R.E., Aaron M. Oral рolyphosphate suppresses bacterial collagenase production and prevents anastomotic leak due to serratia marcescens and pseudomonas aeruginosa // Ann Surg. 2017, Feb 3.
4. Буянов В.М. и др. Однорядный непрерывный шов в абдоминальной хирургии // Хирургия. 2000. № 4. С. 13-18.
5. Королев В.А. Совершенствование способов кишечного шва // Вестн. РГМУ. 2005. Т. 42, № 3. С. 64.
6. Docherty J.G. et al. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery // Annals of Surgery. 1995. Vol. 221, No. 2. P. 176-184.
7. Piccolomini A. et al. Manual and mechanic anastomosis. Comparison in oncologic surgery of the colon and rectum // Minerva Chirurgica. 1990. Vol. 45, No. 5. P. 237-240.
8. Burch J.M. et al. Single layer continuous versus two layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial // Annals of Surgery. 2000. Vol. 231, No. 6. P. 832-837.
9. Будашев В.П. и др. Методы оптимизации кишечного анастомозирования в условиях экспериментального распространенного гнойного перитонита // Бюл. ВСНЦ СО РАМН. 2006. № 6 (52). С. 139-146.
10. Винник Ю.С., Кочетова Л.В., Маркелова Н.М. и др. Применение кишечного шва в абдоминальной хирургии // Фундаментальные исследования. 2014. № 7-1. С. 177-180.
11. Naito M., Miura H., Nakamura T., Sato T., Yamanashi T., Tsutsui A., Watanabe M. Sutureless functional end-to-end anastomosis using a linear stapler with polyglycolic acid felt for intestinal anastomoses // Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond). 2017 Mar 31. 17. Р. 50-53. doi: 10. 1016/j. amsu. 2017. 03. 037. eCollection 2017 May.
12. Жук И.Г., Салмин Р.М., Гайдук А.В., Салмин И.М., Стенько А.А. Способы профилактики несостоятельности межкишечных анастомозов (обзор) // Журн. Гродненского гос. мед. ун-та. 2010. № 1 (29). С. 3-6.
13. Witzke J.D. Stapled versus hand sewn anastomoses in patients with small bowel injury: a changing perspective // Trauma. 2010. Vol. 43, No. 2. P. 250-255.
14. Tabola R., Cirocchi R., Fingerhut A. et al. A systematic analysis of controlled clinical trials using the NiTi CAR™ compression ring in colorectal anastomoses // Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Mar. 21(3). P. 177-184. doi: 10. 1007/s10151-017-1583-2. Epub 2017 Jan 28. Review.
15. De Fina S., Franciosi C., Codecasa G. et al. The use of the biofragmentable ring (BAR-Valtrac) in colon surgery // Minerva Chir. 2000 Mar. 55(3). Р. 133-137. Italian.
16. Жариков А.Н., Лубянский В.Г., Кантеева Ю.Л., Лядгина Т.В. Влияние нарушений региональной гемодинамики и микроциркуляции кишечной стенки на возникновение острых перфораций тонкой кишки // Вестн. эксперимент. и клин. хирургии. 2015. Т. 8, № 1 (26). С. 34-44.
17. Kilam S.K., Jackson F.L., Williams H.T. Bacterial peritonitis and the bursting strength of intestinal anastomoses // Can. J. Surg. 1975 Jul. 18(4). P. 372-375, 378.
18. Hau T., Payne W.D., Simmons R.L. Fibrinolytic activity of the peritoneum during experimental peritonitis // Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1979 Mar. 148(3). P. 415-418.
19. De Franco S., Gelmetti M., Lampugnani R., Gamrielli M. Effects of lymph stasis on healing of rat intestinal anastomosis // Lymphology. 1984 Sep. 17(3). P. 100-104.
20. Сипливый В.А., Гринченко С.В., Горголь Н.И., Доценко В.В., Евтушенко А.В. Патоморфологические особенности гемоциркуляторного русла тонкого и толстого кишечника при остром перитоните //Klin. Khirurgia. 2014. № 1. С. 61-63.
21. Osterberg J., Johnsson C., Gannedahl G., Westlund A., Haglund U. Alterations in mucosal immune cell distribution in septic rats // Shock. 1997 Mar. 7(3). P. 182-185.
22. Cуковатых Б.С., Блинков Ю.Ю., Фролова О.Г. Механизмы развития распространенного перитонита // Вестн. эксперимент. и клин. хирургии. 2012. Т. 5, № 2. С. 469-477.
23. Hesp W. et al. Histological features of wound repair: a comparison between experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses // British Journal of Experimental Pathology. 1985. Vol. 66, No. 5. P. 511-518.
24. Ding C., Ren J., Zhou B. et al. Laser speckle contrast imaging for assessment of abdominal visceral microcirculation in acute peritonitis: does sequential impairments exist? // Microvasc Res. 2014 Sep. 95. P. 26-30. doi: 10. 1016/j. mvr. 2014. 06. 011.
25. Chou M.C., Wilson M.A., Spain D.A., Hadjiminas D., Anderson G.L., Cheadle W.G., Garrison R.N. Endothelin-1 expression in the small intestine during chronic peritonitis // Shock. 1995 Dec. 4(6). P. 411-414.
26. Mohammad U. N. et al. Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection // World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006. Vol. 12, No. 6. P. 2497-2504.
27. Егиев В.Н. Однорядный непрерывный шов анастомоза в абдоминальной хирургии. М.: Мед-практика-М, 2002.
Review
For citations:
Vainer Y.S., Atamanov K.V., Veryatin Y.A. Anatomical justification of a modified way of enteric anastomosis formation under diffuse peritonitis. Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. 2018;(1):21-31.
Views:
154
Email this article 