Retracted Article: Diethylaminoethylchitosan: synthesis and antibacterial activity
https://doi.org/10.31549/2542-1174-2019-2-51-60
Abstract
In this study, non-selectively substituted N,O-diethylaminoethylchitosan (DEAE-CS-I) with a high degree of substitution of 1.2 and selectively N-substituted diethylaminoethylchitosan (DEAE-CS-II) with a moderate degree of substitution of 0.57 were obtained. The diethylaminoethyl substituent causes increased antibacterial activity in vitro of the obtained polymers compared to the initial chitosan. The antibacterial activity of diethylaminoethyl derivatives increases with a rise of the degree of substitution. The highest antibacterial activity was detected for the DEAE-CS-I derivative. The toxicity of the derivatives obtained also increases with an growth in the degree of substitution and, for a highly substituted derivative, has a pronounced dependence on concentration. At concentrations close to the minimum inhibitory concentration, the toxicity of both derivatives is comparable to the toxicity of the starting chitosan. The derivatives obtained are of interest for further in vivo studies.
About the Authors
A. S. KritchenkovRussian Federation
Kritchenkov Andrey Sergeevich — Cand. Sci. (Chem.), Teaching Assistant of the Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; Associate Professor, Faculty of Food Biotechnology, St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str, Moscow, 117198
O. V. Kurlyuk
Belarus
Kurlyuk Oleg Valerievich — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Pharmacology
Vitebsk
T. V. Shakolo
Belarus
Shakolo Tatiana Vladimirovna — Senior Lecturer of the Department of Industrial Technology of Drugs
Vitebsk
A. R. Egorov
Russian Federation
Egorov Anton Romanovich — Post-graduate Student
St. Petersburg
Yu. O. Fedotova
Russian Federation
Fedotova Yulia Olegovna — Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology
St. Petersburg
References
1. Li B., Shan C.L., Ge M.Y. et al. (2013). Antibacterial mechanism of chitosan and its applications in the protection of plant from bacterial disease: a mini review. Asian J. Chem., 25, 18, 10033–10036.
2. Verlee A., Mincke S., Stevens C.V. (2017). Recent developments in antibacterial and antifungal chitosan and its derivatives. Carbohydrate Polymers, 164, 268–283.
3. Goy R.C., Assis O.B.G., De Britto D. (2009). A review of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan. Polimeros, 19, 3, 241–247.
4. Ravi Kumar M.N.V., Muzzarelli R.A.A., Muzzarelli C., Sashiwa H., Domb A.J. (2004). Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem. Rev., 104, 12, 6017–6084.
5. Rahman A., Choudhary M.I., Thompson W.J. (2001). Bioassay Techniques for Drug Development. Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers, 16, 2024 p.
6. Kim J.H., Lee Y.M. (1993). Synthesis and properties of diethylaminoethyl chitosan. Polymer, 34, 9, 1952– 1957.
7. Helander I.M., Nurmiaho-Lassila E.L., Ahvenainen R., Rhoades J., Roller S. (2001). Chitosan disrupts the barrier properties of the outer membrane of Gramnegative bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 71, 2–3, 235–244.
8. Kong M., Chen X.G., Liu C.S. et al. (2008). Antibacterial mechanism of chitosan microspheres in a solid dispersing system against E. coli. Colloids and Surfaces. B: Biointerfaces, 65, 2, 197–202
Review
For citations:
Kritchenkov A.S., Kurlyuk O.V., Shakolo T.V., Egorov A.R., Fedotova Yu.O. Retracted Article: Diethylaminoethylchitosan: synthesis and antibacterial activity. Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. 2019;(2):51-60. https://doi.org/10.31549/2542-1174-2019-2-51-60