Peculiarities of judicial practice in dealing with cases involving defects in the provision of dental care for dental implants
https://doi.org/10.31549/2542-1174-2019-2-18-28
Abstract
The article presents the peculiarities of forensic examinations with the identifi cation of characteristic features and problem sides in assessing the achieved outcomes of the dental rehabilitation of patients who used dental implants in their treatment. We analysed 135 civil cases related to defects in the provision of implant care for the period 2013–2016, containing the conclusions of experts from independent and state forensic medical institutions, statements of the claim of citizens and court decisions. The analysis showed the existence of certain differences in the methods of conducting such examinations, which is due to the properties of the dental implantation method it self characterized by a long period of treatment, the technical and methodological complexity of treatment, the fi nancial capacity of the method, and the participation of a large number of specialists in the treatment process. The perspective planning of the development of new criteria for the assessment of existing methods should be based on the ongoing situational analysis of emerging judicial practice in implant cases. This will allow to objectify the assessment of the achieved results of the treatment and to increase the evidence of peer review.
About the Authors
S. N. Andreeva
Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andreeva Svetlana Nikolaevna — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician for Outpatient Care, Clinic for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry
Moscow
V. A. Fetisov
Bureau of Forensic Medical Examination
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Fetisov Vadim Anatolyevich — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Forensic Expert of the Department of Particularly Complex Reexamination and Commission Examination of the Division of Complex Examination
10, Ekaterininskiy Prospect, St. Petersburg, 195067
References
1. Barinov E.Kh., Romodanovsky P.O. (2015). Study of the problem of forensic medical examination in medical disputes. Medical Law: Th eory and Practice, 1, 1, 1, 182–184. In Russ.
2. Barinov E.Kh., Romodanovsky P.O. (2015). Realization of commission forensic medical examinations related to substandard medical care in dentistry Medical Law: Theory and Practice, 1, 1, 1, 185–193. In Russ.
3. Barinov E.Kh., Romodanovsky P.O., Kosukhina O.I. (2015). The use by the court of the results of the forensic examination of cases involving the provision of medical care Medical Law: Theory and Practice, 1, 2, 2, 44–48. In Russ.
4. Gusarov A.A., Popova T.G., Fetisov V.A., Kuraeva E.Yu., Shoniya E.A. (2017). The clinical and expert evaluation of the unfavourable consequences of the provision of the dental implantation treatment. Forensic Medical Expertise, 60, 3, 34–38.
5. Kovalev A.V. (2017). The Procedure of a Forensic Medical Examination and the Establishment of Causal Relationships in the Event of Failure to Provide or Inadequate Medical Care. Guidelines. Moscow, 29 p. In Russ.
6. Kulakov A.A., Shestakov V.T. (2012). Examination of the Quality of Dental Care (Clinical Aspects). Moscow, 365 p. In Russ.
7. Barinov E.Kh., Zharov V.V., Cherkalina E.N., Bobyleva M.V., Kosukhina O.I. (2012). The dynamics of commission forensic medical examinations in civil cases in Moscow for 2004–2010. Medical Expertise and Law, 3, 46–48. In Russ.
8. Luzanova I.M. (2016). Communicative problems in the rendering of medical care. Medical Law: Theory and Practice, 2, 2, 4, 183–189. In Russ.
9. Kameneva K.Yu., Barinov E.Kh. (2016). Categorical and probabilistic conclusions of the medical forensic examination on “medical” disputes. Medical Law: Theory and Practice, 2, 2, 4, 113–116. In Russ.
Review
For citations:
Andreeva S.N., Fetisov V.A. Peculiarities of judicial practice in dealing with cases involving defects in the provision of dental care for dental implants. Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. 2019;(2):18-28. https://doi.org/10.31549/2542-1174-2019-2-18-28
Views:
180
Email this article 